Speak freely, truthfully

Re: Denialism hurtful, not a crime: Kinew (Oct. 15)

Premier Wab Kinew is to be congratulated for taking a firm stand on a fundamental value of a healthy democracy —free speech — especially given the criticism he now faces.

Historically, the right to speak freely as long as we don’t incite violence serves Canadians well, both individually and as a society. Free speech allows criticism of government, unlike in authoritarian regimes, and provides an open forum that gives people freedom to form opinions uncensored by others.

Banning speech can have negative consequences, I would argue one example being the ban on Holocaust denial. Recent surveys reveal that some Canadians lack basic knowledge of the Holocaust. Perhaps if denialism was public rather than hidden in private chat rooms, more Canadians would understand the horror of Nazi crimes. What better defence against antisemitism, and, likewise, against false claims about residential schools?

The proper response to denialism is speech documenting historical facts, whereas a ban means lost opportunities to engage in such talk. Counter-arguments are critical, given Canadians will still be exposed to the offensive speech, from both within and outside the country (e.g., on social media). Open discussion in family and public settings (e.g., newspapers) will better prepare everyone to counter such confrontations.

People believe and say many ugly things. We should recognize offensive speech, including about residential schools, as an opportunity to reflect on and discredit false ideas, as affirmed by Premier Kinew’s call for “education.” Canadians become more knowledgeable and mentally resilient, and our integrity as a bastion of free speech and democracy remains intact.